1 screenshot vs 4 screenshots

-

I've seen this effect time and time again over the years with the computer work I've done right across the board.... If you include an example screenshot, the reader becomes hyperfocused on the screenshot and deprecates* all my words or the plead to look at the big picture of what I am trying to say.

Case and point. There are 3-4 (Depending on how you count it) versions of the Iridium toolkit in use.
Two of them are not compatible with the the other two in many ways. Two of them are annoyingly close.
Every feeder will calmy state they are using 'the latest' and the version can be hard for the feeder to find.
Updating the feeder is very tricky for most - then you have 2 docker versions floating around which do stuff with acars router (or not).
The result of that mess for me is that my site has code on the Iridium feeder input that tries to auto detect and convert all 4 versions into one usable version for the site. (I really should annoy Kevin more and find out how the black puma of ACARS - airframes.io - handles this mess?).

Should have I included 4 screenshots of the 4 different Iridium data types my sites sees?
Does anyone other than me care about the 4 types?
Is having screenshots of all 4 types important to the core question of should I include hyphens or not in the site search and table displays on the site?




What is my point of all this? I included a screen shot of a 'tail' and no hyphen and so some DMs pointed out how they see 'reg' and hyphens in their iridium data. 

The core problem is the same across the board, be it L-Band, C-Band, VDL or HFDL.... I just don't know how to write a blog that explains in full detail every detail that I fight with on the site to make it both  accurate and useful for every single #avgeek in the world.

I started this blog because I hate YouTube and am resisting the loud and long calls for me to make YouTubes about ACARS and using the site.
I also was/am not excited about YouTube comments. I don't like the fact that you need to have an account to comment and it is not really setup to have a dialog with commenters.
3 blogs in and I'm wondering if this is the right platform, or perhaps I am just the wrong guy to be doing this.

In closing, re-reading this blog makes it sound like I am complaining about the comments and DMs. Im not, its just that I put time into asking a question and I get comments and DMs about the screenshots and nothing on the question. This is starting to sound like one of my live stream fireside rants. Something I wanted to ovoid.

Death to the hyphen. Long live the hyphen!

*Used in the software sense here: usable but regarded as obsolete and best avoided.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

E-6 Using Tactical Hex Codes

-
Image
Let's now take what we learned from my last blog (about the tar1090 based sites using the mictronics airframe database) and see how to apply that knowledge to the current situation of the E-6 aircraft not showing up as usual on ADSB tracking sites. Please keep in mind that once again, my constant droning on and on about this statement is as true as ever: I'm too busy building and running the site to use it. In other words, I see my role as helping folks understand subtle things about OSINT aircraft tracking that from a pure observing point of view have largely gone undiscussed in the past. And for sure no one has been able to bring in the ACARS aspect of tracking ever before. Said another way, I try and keep up with what folks are talking about in regard to ADSB/C aircraft tracking and help them understand the data and how to tie in ACARS data to assist if possible. @neetintel X spaces. I happen to listen for a few minutes to neet's spaces stream and they commented on how ...
Read more

Sites up. Feeds are down.

-
Image
June 22nd Update. The L-Band feed from 98w is back up and running. Just leave my C-Band 98w feed to go. Making great progress restoring all the ACARS feeds. June 18th Update. Most feeds are now back up and running. Managed to keep the main big outage down to about 3.5 days. (Was up working on the feeds at around 3:30am after 4 hours sleep). L-Band Americas is still down for a few more days and C-Band is still more than a month out, so those two are right as expected.  It's not you - it's me. This is a 'planned' outage. Additionally, please note that since the central computer storing the ACARS messages is also not receiving the feed data, all messages during this time will be lost . If I had to guess, I'd say that the feeds will be down for about a week. More bad news. Because a few of the satcom feeds (C-Band and L-Band) are set up via a relay computer, some feeds will not be making it to airframes.io That said, your best bet to see ACARS messages during the outage...
Read more

Community ADSB airframe database

-
Image
 I do NOT maintain the community (ADSB) airframe details database - You Do. Ever since I built version 1 of my ACARS website some seven years ago, I have pretty consistently received messages indicating that one of the ICAO hex, registration, or type details on my site is incorrect. (One gent about 5 years ago, very memorably sent an extremely angry message reporting how one (obscure) airframe had the wrong details and if it was wrong, then NOTHING on my site could be relied on to be accurate and so I was forcing him to not just stop using my site, but he felt it was his duty to warn every other avgeek he knew away from my site. The interesting thing for me is that he clearly only wanted to report it (complain about it) he never asked how it could be updated / corrected. This was my first and only interaction with this chap - I did not reply; he made his point clear, and he was right, the airframe in question was wrong - on mine and every other tar1090 website at that time). This ...
Read more