Iridium HC610 antenna mount by airframes.io
The wait was worth it.
The crew at https://shop.airframes.io have really done an amazing job with this antenna mount.
Backing up just a bit and sort of repeating a bit more of what's already on my GitHub Iridium page, but this time, we are just talking about antennas for Iridium.
Over the years I've easily tested about 8 to 10 antennas and 3 SDRs and a lot of combinations of them.
I guess an exhaustive blog should really photograph and list model numbers... And if the results had been close or nebulous in any way, IF that were the case, then yes, I would be listing everything I've tried and would be asking for sanity checks left and right.
But, as you can probably tell, there was no uncertainty; we have a rock solid clear 'winner' in the Iridium antenna world.
The winner first....
The UFO and 'the stick'.
Both about the same. The UFO was active. The stick, passive, but I always test passive antennas with and without the nooelec iridium IR LNA.
The UFO is a BT-170.
The stick is this guy
But sadly, while it was active, it was mostly just deaf.
Proof that bigger is not always better.
The UFO, the bluecosmo and the HC610
I also tested several patch antennas.
I tested them as well. The 'taoglas' on the right is a perfect example of a patch promoted as being 'special' for Iridium. Yeah. Nah.
Ok, enough with the patch antenna insanity.
Small but mighty. This is THE Iridium combo.
Ok, so you have your antenna. How do you hold it in the air?
Well, it depends.
Are you mounting it on top of a pole, on a flat surface, or on the side of a pole?
If you are going on top, the mount choice is clear...
Head on over to the HC610 antenna mount page at airframes.io and click Buy with shop.
Can't promise you will get a Lego piece, but it was a quirky, fun surprise.
The anodizing is spot on as is the drilled and machined holes. Just really a work of art.
The pole mount is made to fit a pole with an outside diameter of 32mm or 1 and 1/4 inches.
I really like both / either of these aluminum mounts as it is perfectly flat. Why does that matter? Note the bottom of the HC610 antenna; it has a rubber O-ring to keep the water out of the coax. The flat mount of the airframes plates will ensure that the O ring can do its job.
Well, at this point, we enter DIY land....
I used this 3D printed arm at our Idaho KCOE station and was pretty happy - with some gotchas.
Here is the print file that will get you started: https://www.printables.com/model/430130-25mm-pole-mount-for-hc610-iridium-antenna
In KCOE case, we had a thick coax with N-type connector.
I had to drill and Dremel out the 3D print to get the N connector to fit up the guts.
The other issue is that the print is not perfectly flat and so I chose to put some silicon sealant under the HC610 in addition to its O-ring to help keep the water out of the coax.
As if we needed any more proof, the HC610 and AirspyR2 are the clear champions of Iridium.
If you want to take a deeper dive into setting up an Iridium station and adding your data to the global quest to catch ACARS messages, you can read more details here: https://thebaldgeek.github.io/Iridium.html
Drop me a comment here if you have any specific questions that are not covered. This is a brand-new mode, I don't have all the answers, more than happy to share all that I can about Iridium ACARS.
Comments
Post a Comment